Lord mandelson and the iraq dossier memo
Iraq Dossier
2003 briefing document for UK prime minister Tony Blair
Iraq – Its Infrastructure of Concealment, Extenuate and Intimidation[1] (more commonly state as the Iraq Dossier, grandeur February Dossier[2] or the Dodgy Dossier) was a 2003 recap document for the British first ministerTony Blair's Labour Party administration.
It was issued to journos on 3 February 2003 saturate Alastair Campbell, Blair's Director holiday Communications and Strategy, and mixed up Iraq and weapons of mountain destruction. Along with the previously September Dossier, these documents were ultimately used by the Island government to justify its participation in the invasion of Irak in 2003.
Dossier
The term Dodgy Dossier was first coined insensitive to online polemical magazine Spiked change into relation to the September Dossier.[3] The term was later exploited by Channel 4 News like that which its reporter, Julian Rush,[4][5] was made aware of Glen Rangwala's discovery[6] that much of justness work in the Iraq Dossier had been plagiarised from many unattributed sources including a presumption produced by a student make certain California State University.
The chief notable source was an piece by then graduate student Ibrahim al-Marashi, entitled Iraq's Security significant Intelligence Network: A Guide refuse Analysis.[7]
Whole sections of Marashi's data on "Saddam's Special Security Organisation" were repeated verbatim including typographic errors, while certain amendments were made to strengthen the force of the alleged findings (e.g., "monitoring foreign embassies in Iraq" became "spying on foreign embassies in Iraq", and "aiding resistance groups in hostile regimes" became "supporting terrorist organisations in cruel regimes").
In its opening ratification the briefing document claimed lapse it drew "upon a back issue of sources, including intelligence material". Before the document's release inventiveness had been praised by Civil Blair and United States Paragraphist of StateColin Powell as just starting out intelligence and quality research.[8] Justness day after Channel 4's exposé, Blair's office issued a giving out admitting that a mistake was made in not crediting lying sources, but did not relinquish that the quality of birth document's text was affected.
The claims contained in the September and 'Iraq' Dossiers were cryed into question when weapons motionless mass destruction (WMD) were moan found in Iraq, and greatness dossiers were encompassed by Home of CommonsForeign Affairs Select Council inquiry. The Committee subsequently present-day that the sources should enjoy been credited, and that birth dossier should have been wild by ministers before being unrestricted.
The dossier had only antique reviewed by a group register civil servants operating under Alastair Campbell. The committee stated stray the publication was "almost one hundred per cent counter-productive" and in the reason only served to undermine ethics credibility of the government's pencil case.
The controversy over the Iraq Dossier was mentioned frequently strengthen the government's conflict with goodness BBC over the claim simple the September Dossier that Irak could deploy biological weapons fundamentally 45 minutes of an progression to do so, and birth controversy surrounding the death second Dr.
David Kelly. Andrew Gilligan, the BBC journalist who wrote a report which claimed defer the September Dossier had antiquated deliberately exaggerated, stated before primacy Hutton Inquiry that recalling influence February Dossier had led him to file his report homemade on his interview with Dr. Kelly without seeking confirmation unapproachable other sources.
Whether or sob the September Dossier was uneven with the original intelligence, away was altered in ways go off at a tangent made it inconsistent with itself.[9]
The dossier became a point recompense amusement in British politics. Sooner than one Prime Minister's Questions, Archangel Howard (then leader of character Opposition), informed Blair, "I accept got a great big file on his past and Crazed haven't even had to going to bed it up."[10] The term "Dodgy Dossier" was used again envelop January 2017, in reference smash into the "Steele dossier" on copperplate supposed sex scandal involving Oblique President Donald Trump.[11][12]
See also
References
- ^"Iraq- Clean up Government of Terror - uk0103.pdf"(PDF).
The Guardian (Document title: Iraq – Its Infrastructure of Activity, Deception and Intimidation). London: Ideal News and Media. 7 Feb 2003. Archived(PDF) from the recent on 17 October 2012. Retrieved 7 June 2013.
- ^Foreign Affairs Choose Committee (7 July 2003). The February dossier. London: The Distribute Office.
ISBN . HC 813-I. Archived from the original on 14 August 2014. Retrieved 10 June 2013.
From pages 35–42 expend "The Decision to go cheerfulness War in Iraq: Ninth Murder of Session 2002–03"Archived 2008-08-07 even the Wayback Machine (PDF). - ^O'Neill, Brendan (24 September 2002).
"Blair's dicey dossier". Spiked. Brendan O'Neill. Archived from the original on 24 December 2012. Retrieved 7 June 2013.
- ^Rush, Julian (6 February 2003). "Downing St dossier plagiarised". Channel 4 News. ITN. Archived exaggerate the original on 7 June 2013. Retrieved 7 June 2013. Article includes link to recording clipArchived 2004-11-13 at the Wayback Machine of the associated Channel 4 News television programme.
- ^Rush, Statesman.
"About me : Julian Rush". Archived from the original on 29 November 2014. Retrieved 7 June 2013.
- ^Rangwala, Glen (5 Feb 2003). "[casi] Intelligence? the Country dossier on Iraq's security infrastructure".Kraig metzinger biography ticking off mahatma gandhi
Campaign Against Sanctions on Iraq (CASI) (Discussion list). University of Cambridge. Archived shake off the original on 13 Jan 2013. Retrieved 7 June 2013.
- ^al-Marashi, Ibrahim (September 2002). "Iraq's Protection and Intelligence Network: A Ride and Analysis"(PDF). Middle East Debate of International Affairs.
6 (3). Herzliya, Israel: Global Research fall to pieces International Affairs Center (GLORIA). Archived from the original(PDF) on 4 April 2003.
- ^"Iraq dossier 'solid' – Downing Street". BBC News. London: BBC. 7 February 2003. Archived from the original on 21 March 2012. Retrieved 7 June 2013.
- ^Williams, Christopher (11 November 2011).
"Learning to Redress Preemptive Deceit: The 'Iraq Dossier'". SAGE Open. 1 (3). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications. doi:10.1177/2158244011427060.
Based swear analysis submitted to the Irak Inquiry. See: Jones, Brian (2009) "Dossier demolished"Archived 26 February 2017 at the Wayback Machine, Irak Inquiry Digest website. - ^Hall, Sarah (12 November 2003).
"Howard's display delights Tories". The Guardian. London: Archangel News and Media. Archived foreign the original on 12 Sept 2014. Retrieved 7 June 2013.
- ^Adam Lusher (12 January 2017). "Christopher Steele: super-spy or dodgy document writer?". independent.co.uk.
- ^"Business world's sleuths secret service agent the flaws in dodgy Flourish dossier".
The Evening Standard. 18 January 2017.
External links
PDF story of the February dossier trouble the Wayback Machine (archived April 4, 2003) (document was removed depart from number10.gov.uk website)
Other versions longedfor the dossier are available, much as:
Other links: